What did the Eighth Circuit decide in Rodriguez v United States?

What did the Eighth Circuit decide in Rodriguez v United States?

In concluding that the de minimis intrusion here could be offset by the Government’s interest in stopping the flow of illegal drugs, the Eighth Circuit relied on Pennsylvania v. Mimms, 434 U. S. 106.

What was the issue in Rodriguez v United States?

Lacking the same close connection to roadway safety as the ordinary inquiries, a dog sniff is not fairly characterized as part of the officer’s traffic mission. In concluding that the de minimis intrusion here could be offset by the Government’s interest in stopping the flow of illegal drugs, the Eighth Circuit relied on Pennsylvania v.

What did officer Struble do in Rodriguez v United States?

When Rodriguez refused, Struble detained him until a second officer arrived. Struble then retrieved his dog, who alerted to the presence of drugs in the vehicle. The ensuing search revealed methamphetamine. Seven or eight minutes elapsed from the time Struble issued the written warning until the dog alerted.

Is the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Miami?

Additionally, in at least one instance, a caller reported being asked for money. While the calls appear to originate from the Clerk’s Office in Miami (305-579-4430), these calls are “spoofed” and are not from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.

The Eighth Circuit affirmed. Noting that the seven or eight minute delay was an acceptable “ de minimis intrusion on Rodriguez’s personal liberty,” the court declined to reach the question whether Struble had reasonable suspicion to continue Rodriguez’s detention after issuing the written warning. 1.

Who was the officer who stopped Rodriguez in Nebraska?

Officer Struble, a K–9 officer, stopped petitioner Rodriguez for driving on a highway shoulder, a violation of Nebraska law.